Republican Economics ?
Last comment by waranne 3 months, 1 week ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Greetings Y'all,

The state of the economy and what to do about it will probably top a long list of issues of concern to voters.That this is so is really no surprise because although citizens are affected by many,many issues,everyone seems to be affected by the state of the economy in a very direct way.The war, the environment,the price of gas touch us all and all are very painful and very serious ,but all are trumped by the very mundane fear of losing a job and a livlihood.

The traditional wisdom has been that since the Republican Party has traditionally been more attuned to business concerns that Republicans have the better view about what to do with the economy,especially a faltering economy.It is a reasonable assumption given the some of the excesses of big labor and its close association with the Democratic Party.But time and tide moves on.

The Republican Party ,at least as it is presently constituted, is reponsible for much of the mess we find ourselves in right now.Until fairly recently, a Republican president and a Republican dominated Congress have permitted the subprime mortgage disaster to unfold,largely as the result of deregulation and an unquestioning faith in the virtues of laissez faire---something even Adam Smith would question,overturning banking regulations in place since the Great Depression and allowing the fox to run the henhouse.

Our trade deficit with China continues to soar even after the braintrust at the Commerce Department made a special trip to China essentially to do the kowtow.The Chinese promise to play nice ,and we continue to lose manufacturing jobs.They sell us toxic,defective and dangerous goods and Commerce,the FDA,The Department of Agriculture just roll over.

NAFTA began with Clinton and so some of the blame rests on Clinton ,but some of the faith placed in that agreement may be excused because the idea was fairly new and we did not know then the trade surplus we ran with Mexico would soon turn into a yawning trade deficit.Remember Perot and all of that noise about the loud sucking sound,the sound of jobs being sucked from the American economy?

At present there can be no doubt that NAFTA was a very bad idea ,indeed,and yet we now have entered into CAFTA.We continue to import poverty in the form of millions of unskilled workers from Mexico and all of Latin America while we continue to export our prosperity.We are governed by fervent free traders despite the fact that what is described as free trade is free trade only as far as the US is concerned.Our trading partners are not burdened by such quaint notions.

Immigration has been out of control for quite some time now ,so all of the blame cannot be placed on the Bush Administration.Unfortunately,however, the problem has gotten much worse under his watch.Remember all of the hand shaking and abrazos with Vicente Fox, a man wags described as the president of Mexico and the US? We now have Calderon a man who seems to believe that the president of Mexico is also resposible for dictating US policy.The McCain/Kennedy "comprensive" immigration plan was essentially yet another ammnesty scheme and a policy favored by the open borders crowd at the Wall Street Journal and the US Chamber of Commerce--- must have that cheap labor, labor largely subsidized by the US taypayer in the form of the huge social costs that such "cheap" labor really exacts.

Tax cuts? Sounds like a good idea--- more money spent in reinvestment and job creation.The only problem is that much of the money has been invested overseas and the benefits ascribed to trickle down theory are not trickling down.So the rich get richer and the gap between the rich and the poor continues to grow.Since the government has seen no need to curtail spending, the money no longer raised by taxes is borrowed largely from foreign investors and foreign governments at the same time that we are spending trillions to underwrite interminable wars in the Middle East and mortgaging our future.Incidentally, no other administration Democrat or Republican has seen fit to cut taxes during war time. Whatever happened to war bonds anyway?

If you like tainted meat and suspect food and drugs,thank W. We now have a voluntary inspection system---we don't need no stinking badges!

A lot of people see Obama as a threat to the economy ,but could he do worse? I'm afraid McCain will continue some of the failed policies of the Bush Administration,policies that we know have failed. Are we gambling that much if we seek change?

Musca




Latest Activity: Jun 29, 2008 at 5:10 PM



Blog has been viewed (93) times.

bullochguy commented on Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:53 PM

Yeah our economy is in as shambles, but anyone who thinks Mccain will continue Bush's polacies hasn't paid any attention to his past.

I know some will accuse him of that simply because he runs as a Republican, and will not make a fair and informed decision. I am actually a little scared of him because of where he sides with the nuts. You cited the Immigration amnisty bill as a great example.

Lower taxes are indeed good, however you have to spend less, which is where Bush has really faultered.

Will Obama do worse? I believe so. You have to thoughroughly examine what he has expressed doing to the Cap gains tax, remember if the wealthy stop playing the market were in a DEPRESSION! People shouldn't throw us into one just to see there party win. What kind of victory is it if you vote for him, and he throws us farther down the stairs? He is also very likely to expande social programs that are way to large now. Then he's going to want to raise all our taxes to pay for more abled bodied people to not work, and to pay for more Illigal immigrants(lets call them what they are) because we know he's likely to try and give them amnisty.

As for trade, well NAFTA doesn't work that well, however if we go crazy with Tarrifs, so will our trade partners then we may not be better off.

I see voting for Obama as much of a gamble as playing Russian rulette with 5 bullets in the gun! It way more than likely your gonna lose big.

waranne commented on Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:28 PM

Yeah--my gun only has 5 bullets!


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by theflyonthewall
 
The Jiffy Crisis
July 18, 2008
Musca's Flyspeck for the Day Annus Horribilis! We are beset with an endless litany of disasters large and small. Pick up a paper or listen to the news on the radio or the TV ,and you could get t...
Read More »
 
Economic Purism or Economic Pragmatism?
July 04, 2008
Fly Here, We are living through one of those watershed periods in history.The Civil War,World War 1,the Great Depression,World War 2, the Space Race,Viet Nam all have left an indelible imprint o...
Read More »
 
A Fly at the Department of Energy
June 11, 2008
Hi Y'all, I haven't posted a blog in a while because I took a brief trip to Washington to visit an old friend who hangs out at the Food and Drug Administration.He's the original fly in the ointm...
Read More »
 
Chicken and the Fall of Western Civilization
May 31, 2008
Hi Y'all, Being a fly has a lot of advantages.I know flies are not loved by most humans.Most of you think fly---fly strip----fly---fly swatter.I don't have any shoes ,but if you could walk a mil...
Read More »
 
Disinformation Campaign ?
May 30, 2008
Musca's Thought for the Day: I'm not given to conspiracy theories.I don't see sinister motives behind every act ,and I don't believe what should be considered as a matter of coincidence should ,...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]






Powered by
Morris Technology