Hope
Last comment by bullochguy 6 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

I've missed being able to follow the Democratic nomination fight while in Italy.

As I write today, the inevitable nomination of Barack Obama has come to pass. He's got the right amount delegates, and depending on the math, the popular vote. Most of my closest friends know that I have been very skeptical of Mr. Obama throughout the process, as a devout Hillary supporter in the primaries.

Mrs. Clinton's experience as a public servant for the past 40 years, dating all the way back to her excellent College graduation speech, has always been inspiring to me. However, not everyone feels this way. I find that many people dislike Hillary because she's "cold," "distant," or "conniving." This to me has always been a silly reason to outright hate her, because it has little to do with what she stands for.

In fact, if you look at her record, she has been dedicated to helping people throughout her career. Her Methodist youth pastor in the 1960's first taught her this importance, reminiscent of my own former pastor, who has been a great teacher in my life.

To me, Christians who reject the causes she has championed, such as Healthcare and other services, should take a hard look at their Bible. These people are self-serving Pharisees who seek to advance their own wealth, rather than remembering the needy who must have our help. Indeed, her causes have not always be popular among this "Pharisee class," but they have always taught me to be a voice for those who don't have the money or the privilege be heard. Sure, she and President Clinton have amassed many material goods -- yet they have never forgotten their cause.

Yet, despite all of her qualifications and dedication, she lost. Not only did she lose, but she lost to a first term U.S. Senator who has barely been in office 2 years. I simply haven't understood this phenomenon. In whose right mind would anyone vote for someone so lacking in experience? Sen. Obama is a great public speaker, but there is much more to politics and leadership than speech making (though it is an important component, no doubt).

With all of this in mind, it has become very important to learn about the Democratic nominee before making an informed decision as to who I will vote for in November. Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton have always been very similar as far as their agendas are concerned. While some may not agree with these policies, I would hope they would realize the policies of the current administration have failed miserably. Thus, with his securing the nomination, it has been important for me to discover more about his past.

Yesterday, I had the distinct pleasure to learn more about the Senator in "Obama: from Promise to Power," written by the Chicago Tribune's David Mendell. The book is a very unbiased approach that gives readers a clear perspective on his life story, which you aren't likely to find in his own books. I learned the following:

1. He's Ambitious...and always has been. In fact, I would argue that all presidential candidates are. I reject the notion that any candidate runs to enter the Oval Office with completely selfless reasons -- it's a very egotistical job.
2. His father was absent. Obama, Sr. fathered multiple children with multiple wives, only meeting his son Barack twice during his life, having very little impact on the Senator. Barack's mother and grandmother are a much better indicator of his upbringing. However, the Obama, Sr. was brilliant, being a Harvard Scholarship recipient. Those who argue the Senator is "Muslim" by his father's influence are not only downright ignorant, but stupid. He's probably somewhere between a secular humanist and a liberal Christian.
3. Barack is Bipartisan. When he was editor of the Harvard Law Review (the most prestigious legal publication in the country), the Senator placed conservatives who were against his ideological beliefs in editorial roles to maintain balance in the publication.
4. He didn't jump into politics. In fact, Obama spent his years before Harvard as a community builder in low-income Chicago. When he couldn't get churches from around the city to work together and help the poor (due to prejudice), he went to Harvard Law believing legal work would be the way to help them out.
5. He spent time in a third world country. After spending his earliest years in Hawaii, Mr. Obama went to live in Indonesia with his single mother (who was in the Peace Corps), where he experienced first hand the suffering of poverty. After Obama had an accident with barbed wire, the family returned to Hawaii. It was there he completed his education at a white, elite private school.

Does he have experience? Not in the sense that Hillary does. However, he has the tools to be a very successful leader:

1. He's articulate. Obama writes the first draft of every speech he gives. Interestingly enough, he has an incredibly difficult time delivering pieces that speechwriters have penned. I'd love to see what a George W. speech would look like if he wrote it...
2. He's liberally educated. In the sense of "liberal arts," the Senator has got everything it takes -- with an undergraduate degree from a small school in California, and a diploma from Harvard Law. That's not even mentioning his real life experiences, ranging from running a poor community in Chicago, living in a third-world country, or dealing with life in a single-parent home.
3. He's fluent in policy. I would pit a former editor of the Harvard Law Review against anyone. Additionally, as a former College professor, the Senator even taught law before he went into politics. He understands it up and down, which would make him an excellent candidate to craft policy.

As we all know, the Republican nominee is Sen. John McCain, a man who I have always admired. In fact, through my studies at American and Georgetown Universities in during my high school years, he was someone I followed. He was neither Republican or Democrat to me, but rather an "affiliated Independent," who always voted his mind. This is an admirable trait to me. Unfortunately, Sen. McCain has chosen to tie himself to the policies of the past eight years by aligning with President Bush. To achieve the presidency, he has sold out on the values he has held throughout his career, in an effort to appeal to a base which has never liked him.

When I survey our country today, I see a tarnished flag that no longer wraps the blessings of freedom around its people. We are no longer a place where all men are created equal, but rather a society that gives only the privileged and well-endowed the right to succeed. We're piled up so high in debt that we can't afford to save for retirement, pay for a college education, or help the elderly who can't pay for their medicine. Ultimately, America is stuck in a war abroad, while we fight to stay afloat at home.

From sea to shining sea, the people cry for a new direction, and for new leadership that will restore the American flag domestically and abroad. With more hope and inspiration than ever, I will be throwing my support behind Sen. Obama in the fall election, and plan to do everything I can to get involved and ensure that this man of considerable intelligence and education will be our next President. While he wasn't what I was initially looking for, it is not a concession to say "he is the next best choice," implying he is a secondary choice because my candidate lost. He is just as ready to lead on day one, but for a different set of reasons.

I still believe that in this country, those who work hard will be rewarded, even if you come up a little short. Our dreams still live, even if things don't end up the way we planned or expected.


Latest Activity: Jun 04, 2008 at 6:55 AM



Blog has been viewed (205) times.

oldtomblood commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:18 AM

Interesting piece you've written there jkick, we shall see.

katieog commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:00 AM

Well done! A thoughtful, considered piece of writing that puts across your opinions in a respectful, mannerly way.

Would that more people put this much effort into understanding the candidates and their positions before they voted. Whether they actually do their homework or not, my bet's on a LOT more people voting in this election than this country has seen in several generations.

The presumptive candidates are starkly different, as are their platforms, giving voters a clear choice to make, and one taste of having the Supreme Court decide who's going to lead us was enough, don't you think? Every vote counts is not a cliche; it's the indisputable truth.

bullochguy commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2008 at 19:08 PM

Bi-partisan?? You haven't really looked at his record well have you?

Socialized healthcare along with the higher taxes will ffurther bankrupt this country and cause the dollar to plunge. Paso's will be worth more. The higher capitol gains tax will cause the wealthy to stop playing the market, the market will crash and plunge us into a depression.

We don't need more and expanded social programs, we need to fix the ones we have. Get those who just won't work off of them. We don't need socialized medicine. We may need to do something about insurance, but that is all.

All Obama has going for him is that he speaks well when reading a speech. He actually doesn't do so good when answering suprise questions, which is why he doesn't very much. He also doesn't think enough of himself to answer the questions about his shady and downright horrable "friendships".

NowhereMan commented on Thursday, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:52 AM

So Obama is advocating policies that will plunge our country into a depression and he's not advocating anything and just has flowery speeches. That's a neat trick.

Regulator commented on Thursday, Jun 05, 2008 at 18:19 PM

We ought to make people on welfare give something back. Make them apply for jobs. Make them volunteer doing something for the community while they aren't working. If they're disabled, somebody ought to make sure they are really disabled - don't tell me there aren't people out there who lied and get checks who can work just as good as me.
If they're really disabled, give 'em a break, but the ones who just don't want to work - make 'em. I guarantee if they have to work without pay (except the welfare/food stamps) they'll get a job. There's too many loopholes in the free living system we got now.
Obama does say a lot of words that don't mean nothing if you pay attention to him. He's not the only one, though.

bullochguy commented on Thursday, Jun 05, 2008 at 19:10 PM

Yeah all Pols just talk alot, but with Obama the only real stances he takes is Socialized med, Higher taxes, and Pull out of Iraq. The first two will ruin us and the third is just not possable on a short term basis.

I agree welfare needs REFORM and not just alot more cash funneled into it. Will one of you Libs please tell me where anyone gains from expanding this stuff and creating a welfare way of life for perfectly health people? How do we get minoraties to make more of themselves when we continually say "hey don't do anything, we'll take care of you" or "don't work hard in school, we'll turn someone else down so you can get in"?

Someone please tell me what this means "So Obama is advocating policies that will plunge our country into a depression and he's not advocating anything and just has flowery speeches. That's a neat trick." I didn't see this said anywhere here.

whatnext commented on Friday, Jun 06, 2008 at 06:06 AM

Abuse of the system is everywhere in all races, and it’s clear to me that welfare is a failed program for everyone concerned. So I agree that welfare as we know it should be abolished for the betterment of everyone involved.

My question is how to we fix it? Those who have been living off our tax money, were given that opportunity by those in our government – whomever they were – Republican or Democrat matters not. How we move forward is the question. We can’t just turn the welfare system off like a switch; there would be chaos and more crime because people would then be desperate.

How about we ask all those who are getting a paycheck and food stamps paid for by our tax money, be required to take the jobs that were given to illegal immigrants for example? Apparently Americans aren’t willing to apply for these jobs – if they did, they would be hired. You know, farm workers, poultry plants… (But Immigration is another issue for another comment).

Or maybe we could have beautification programs for city parks that need a labor force. Surely there must be a need that can be filled by the folks on welfare. For those with higher education who have fallen on hard luck, we could use their talents for mentoring programs, literacy tutoring, and workforce training.

Parents who stay home on welfare could be required to take geriatric healthcare classes and care for the elderly who are destitute, while staying home to be there for their children. Child care classes could also be required, or some sort of work force training.

We have the Hope Grant to pay for this in Georgia, and our technical colleges already have programs in place that seek to address this need. What if we required that people made an EFFORT to qualify for food stamps and financial support? What if we made the work they do valuable enough to our society that the stigma of welfare were removed and we actually appreciated the results of the program?

The skills on how to take advantage of the system are passed down from generation to generation. Being out of work and impoverished for generations is not only a physical condition, but a mental one. One’s drive to succeed has been stifled and the depression is devastating. Just the physical act of working and having a place to go every morning might be beneficial. Even some mental rehabilitation institutions have programs which require that the inpatients work as part of their therapy so that they can see tangible value in their efforts, which builds self-respect.

Maybe that second chance could be provided by making work-for-pay, 8 hours a day, a part of the "welfare" system. Wouldn’t it benefit us to reform the system to provide a path to self-sufficiency?

bullochguy commented on Friday, Jun 06, 2008 at 17:52 PM

Liberals are gonna be against empowering minoraties, or letting them see that they have what they need to succeed, because then they would probrably lose them in there base. They are happy with ythrowing money at a lot of people to keep them just happy enough to keep voting for them.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by jkick
 
Candidate Forum
October 05, 2008
Georgia Southern University's Student Government will be hosting a Candidate Forum on Tuesday, October 7th from 11:00 AM - 2:00 PM at the Russell Union Rotunda. We hope to see you there! 11:00 -...
Read More »
 
Di Passaggio
August 05, 2008
I mentioned here a few weeks ago that I was in Italy, directing a project. The teaser trailer is now available for those of you who were interested. http://www.dipassaggio.com/
Read More »
 
Tattnall Campmeeting
July 14, 2008
For those of you that don't know about it, Tattnall Campmeeting is a special, old-fashioned religious experience for Christians in our area. A square with an over 100 year old Tabernacle in the cen...
Read More »
 
Summer in Italy
May 25, 2008
I'm spending half the summer in Montepulciano, Italy taking two classes and directing a promotional film for the Regents System, as well as a film for myself which I'm going to trot around to film ...
Read More »
 
Tap Water vs. Bottled Water
April 16, 2008
I directed this spot for the National Tap Water Campaign. Any thoughts on the issue? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRXdT3_nugc Check it on YouTube
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]






Powered by
Morris Technology