City Investigaton
Last comment by watchdog 5 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

First of all I cant believe nobody has blogged about this to begin with. But after sitting back for a week and watching city council videos on YouTube I came up with some interesting questions maybe some of you could help me answer. I don't really understand this concept of the city asking the municipal court judge to appoint an outside person with no ties to Statesboro to investigate the allegations made by Mr. Parker before his firing. Should this outside attorney find any evidence of wrong doing what happens then? He has no legal authority to take any kind of action. Does the city self-sanction itself or do they call the GBI and ask that a formal investigation be done on themselves? If there is wrong doing and it was done knowingly will these elected officials be removed from office? If the GBI ultimately comes in why not have them do it from the get go and save paying city tax dollars to some outside attorney who ultimately cant do anything but say yes they messed up or no they didn't. Does anyone interviewed by him have a duty to answer truthfully and if not are there consequences. This all just seems like a waste of more tax dollars and smoke and mirrors by council. As much as I think this Bill Thomas guy is a big blowhard, I do believe he is right for wanting the GBI to investigate. What do yall think?


Latest Activity: Jul 08, 2014 at 5:52 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Guesswhat
Send Guesswhat a Message
Report Inappropriate Content


Blog has been viewed (471) times.

justsaying commented on Tuesday, Jul 08, 2014 at 18:24 PM

I say bring in the GBI and I think they should start back when Shane Hayes was here and move forward . I also say they should look at all the departments within the city and city council . That way when the guilty are uncovered they can send it to the grand jury and hopefully put their behinds in jail . !!!

wildturkey commented on Tuesday, Jul 08, 2014 at 21:11 PM

so....
the city council fires parker for having little meetings behind closed doors.....
but every one of them denies attending any of these meetings....
if they swear they didn't attend these meetings, how can they fire parker for having meetings that never met???????
only in Statesboro can you have a never ending circus.................

Bryant commented on Friday, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:12 AM

None of the current actions pass the smell test. I do not know Mr. Parker but I can't think of a scenario where lying about illegal meetings would be to his benefit.

Next person selected as city manager better get an iron clad contract or the whimsy of City Council will have him or her on the street the first time someone gets a wild hair.

watchdog commented on Friday, Jul 18, 2014 at 14:48 PM

My question is, why would Parker lie about this? For what reason would he make this up?


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Guesswhat
 
Repetitive comment that has gone unanswered!!!
June 22, 2009
For some reason, I have seen this comment made by Honestanswers on several people's blogs and nobody has really directly commented on it yet: Britt is playing yall for fools: HE and Chance wanted to pay her off with a $450,000 settlement, now they say the people need an explanation ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology