Free Speech Triumphs Once Again...Really??
Last comment by Bryant 1 year, 2 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

OK, so the United States Supreme Court has just decided that is all right for people to lie during a political campaign. Well, no, that’s not exactly right, they decided it is all right for a political group to distort the truth about a candidate’s position.

Actually, that’s not exactly correct either. The U.S. Supreme Court said that a group that wanted to put up a billboard in Ohio could challenge an Ohio elections law that prevented political entities from misstating the truth in political advertisements.

The billboard was to state that this particular candidate was supporting the use of federal tax dollars to promote abortion. The candidate alleged that their proposed billboard was lying and had asked the billboard be prevented from being put up under the provisions of this statue. Who was right? Did the billboard lie?

Wait a minute. There’s more. After all was said and done, the owner of the billboard refused to put it up for fear of a lawsuit. On top of that, U.S. Rep Steve Driehaus, a Democrat from Cincinnati, who was being opposed by Republican candidate Steve Chabot, lost his re-election bid without having to answer the billboards statements.

Even more importantly, the question of whether or not anyone’s rights to free speech were violated was then eventually examined by several Ohio courts: after a federal judge said the suit didn’t matter because the request to invoke the law was actually withdrawn by Driehaus, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati agreed ,stating essentially that the whole matter was moot.

So, considering that the Ohio Elections Commission never really had to make a decision as to whether or not the billboard violated this particular law, why did the U.S. Supreme Court agree to weigh in at all. More confusing, since they did agree to consider the matter, why didn’t they just either strike the law down and be done with it or say, yes, it’s a good law and leave it at that?

As it turns out, many other states have similar laws. Think of all those lawyers in Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin who might be denied the opportunity to makes gobs of money if the Supreme Court actually had ruled Yay or Nay.

So, why didn’t they at least just agree with the other courts in Ohio and say the issue in Ohio was null and void, for nothing was ever put up that gave anyone a reason to invoke this law. Think of how much hot air such a decision would have prevented from being expelled in at the very least the State of Ohio’s courtrooms.

With the nation’s highest court making such a stellar decision, everyone can now walk away after reading their ruling and go ahead and file more lawsuits in all of these states each and every time some other political entity decides to agree or disagree with a political candidates’ viewpoint and is potentially denied the right to publish it or post it or advertise it. Hallelujah! This truly is freedom of speech at its very best!


Latest Activity: Jun 16, 2014 at 3:15 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Regional
Send Regional a Message
Report Inappropriate Content


Blog has been viewed (1276) times.

theflyonthewall commented on Monday, Jun 16, 2014 at 16:18 PM

The case illustrates the great need for campaign reform. Candidates having a large war chest can spend more on advertising and facile lawyers. Too many candidates have also learned the benefits of the big lie: anything repeated enough eventually becomes the truth. In a better world ,members of both parties could work together to solve this problem.

gawalkman commented on Monday, Jun 16, 2014 at 20:22 PM

Who is the bigger fool? The liar or the one who believes the liar?

theflyonthewall commented on Monday, Jun 16, 2014 at 20:28 PM

The liar is no fool because cheaters do prosper..Whether the liar has a conscience or any scruples at all is another matter.

Bryant commented on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 18:13 PM

Those who decry "activist" courts and judges as infringing upon states rights for abortion rulings should be just as upset, if not more so. by this travesty. Unfortunately, the politicians benefiting from such prevarications can always distance themselves, "I did not approve this ad".

Both political parties are guilty (or should I say PACs supporting both political parties?).


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Regional
 
July 4th? Really?
July 04, 2015
Americans celebrate Independence Day on the Fourth of July. Why? We think of July 4, 1776, as the birth of the United States of America. July 4, 1776 wasn't the day that the Continental Congress declared our independence. It was July 2, 1776. The American Revolution actually started in April ...
Read More »
 
July 4th: Who's Independence??
June 30, 2015
The Declaration of Independence is a truly remarkable document. First of all, this is what it begins with, and this is whose independence it addresses: "IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America." ...(It is the thirteen united States of America, and that ...
Read More »
 
Supreme Court and Same Sex Marriage
June 30, 2015
what did the man who is our chief supreme court justice say about the 'majority' decision?? Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts: 1)The human race must procreate to survive. Procreation occurs through sexual relations between a man and a woman...Society has recognized that bond as marriage. And by ...
Read More »
 
Memorial Day and the Confederacy
June 28, 2015
Who knows what Memorial Day is these days...it seems to most people it is a great excuse to buy tons of food and drink and fireworks and then get together with family and friends and act like kids or worse.... Nothing wrong with that...but...gasp...there is now a much darker side ...
Read More »
 
A Logical Overview of Sharia Law
February 06, 2015
First of all, I am not of the Muslim faith, and I am American born. I have however, studied the Middle East for a long time. Sharia means “path” in Arabic. Expected to guide all aspects of the true Muslim’s life, it is taken from the Quran and Sunna, books ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology