Weapon of Mass Destruction?
Last comment by Ironside 4 years, 10 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

So, the US attorney is charging the surviving accused Boston bomber under a flimsy WMD statute. I'm sorry but this offends me because it was a pressure cooker bomb and killed three people. What kind of weapon of mass destruction is that? What kind of political ignorance would lead to such an obviously emotional charge?

I am in no way trying to excuse or mitigate these actions. If the accused is in fact guilty, he chould be tried and convicted of capital murder with aggravating circumstances and sentenced to death. Quit grandstanding. I feel the same way about "hate" crimes. A crime is a crime regardless of whom it is perpetrated upon.

Latest Activity: Apr 26, 2013 at 4:52 PM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Bryant
Send Bryant a Message
Report Inappropriate Content

Blog has been viewed (812) times.

theflyonthewall commented on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 17:19 PM

Bryant, I agree. Perhaps, the US attorney was trying to insure the ultimate sanction just as criminals may be sentenced to spend several lifetimes behind bars.I hope that justice is swift. The bombing was a heinous crime.

wwwhunter commented on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 19:38 PM

I agree to call the pot bomb a WMD is disingenuous at best. Call it what it is, murder, terrorism, assault with a deadly weapon but not a WMD.

Climegeist commented on Saturday, Apr 27, 2013 at 14:35 PM

I think there are a lot of overzealous federal prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves, and making little things into big things is one way to do it.

Bryant commented on Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:11 PM

Clmegeist, "making little things into big things"is possibly not the optimal choice of words. I agree with your sentiment. We often see this at the local level with multiple charges related to a single offense.

Paulie commented on Monday, Apr 29, 2013 at 18:22 PM

You do know that more than 250 people suffered injuries in the two blasts, including dozens who lost limbs?
As terrorist attacks go in the US, that's pretty mass to me. It's amazingly lucky only three people died.
Also, as Fly points out, the charge also ensures the harshest penalties possible are on the table. Massachusetts does not have the death penalty, but a federal WMD charge puts capital punishment on the table.
Federal hate crime statutes were instituted because blacks, Latinos and homosexuals, among others, were the targets of crimes solely because they were black, Latino or homosexual. I've never been the target of a crime because I am a white heterosexual.
Perhaps a specific hate crime statute is an overreach at combating racism and ignorance, but local courts were not giving sentences commensurate with some very violent crimes.

wwwhunter commented on Monday, Apr 29, 2013 at 19:27 PM

WMD to me says biological, chemical or nuclear not pressure cooker. Make no mistake the crime was terrible but to call it a WMD is to me wrong.

Paulie commented on Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:39 AM

Appreciate your thoughts, hunter.
The pressure cooker bombs used in Boston do meet the FBI definition of a WMD:
any "destructive device" as defined in Title 18 USC Section 921: any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas - bomb, grenade, rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, mine, or device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses.
Again, we all agree it was a horrific event whatever you want to call it.

Bryant commented on Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 at 17:57 PM

Paulie, it is the definition which is bogus. I go with hunter. If a pressure cooker bomb is a WMD (unless filled with a biological or chemical agent), then my mother should have to complete a background check when she needs a new one form Wal-Mart.

It's a cheesy charge and reflects a somewhat weak faith in our existing criminal statutes.

Ironside commented on Thursday, May 02, 2013 at 08:56 AM

Bryant: Your right to say that a pressure cooker is not an atom bomb, weapon of mass destruction, but in another sence it is, because of the sociological destruction it is meant to achieve, to cause us to demand more and more government control, like cameras everywhere,in order to be safe. It is a weapon of mass destrution of our freedom and our way of life. Also, this event in Boston is part of the world wide movement to destory the USA and that movement is a weapon of mass destruction. Calling a pressure cooker a weapon of mass destruction is simply a way to identify the act with the movement. We have political leaders who do not what to call it what it is, "a world wide movement by extreme elements who use Islam to control people and want to expand that control to everyone in the world. This is not new in human history, it is human history. This is just the latest version that good people must defeat.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Bryant
Donate Wisely
February 21, 2018
I recently received a solicitation for the "2018 Statesboro Area Appeal" "The Hospice Support Fund". As a fan and supporter of our local hospice, I read the appeal closely. First I will congratulate the parent organization, The New Hope Foundation, for the honesty of their appeal. While slightly misleading by ...
Read More »
Nothing changes, yet
February 19, 2018
I originally posted this February 13, 2017. Today, February 18, 2018, nothing has changed. Our Senators remain tongue tied and Mr. Allen crows about actions which will increase our already crushing debt and endanger the health of rural Georgians. Our President remains a liar, concerned more with the failure of ...
Read More »
Financial quid pro quo?
January 25, 2018
The following is from International Business Times (www.ibtimes.com). If you believe Trump is looking out for the masses I encourage you to read this. Deutsch Bank was one of many players in the financial meltdown in 2008. And all you folks who complained why no one went to jail or ...
Read More »
Guns again, again
November 08, 2017
In case you missed it the first time: Texas, dead church goers, 30 round magazines, failure to report to FBI, and the beat goes on... I thought the time for gun control debate was after more than twenty innocent five and six year old children were killed in Sandy Hook ...
Read More »
Guns, again
October 05, 2017
I thought the time for gun control debate was after more than twenty innocent five and six year old children were killed in Sandy Hook using a military style assault weapon and a high capacity clip. I was wrong. And after Gabby Giffords was almost killed using a pistol with ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology