Weapon of Mass Destruction?
Last comment by Ironside 1 year, 10 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

So, the US attorney is charging the surviving accused Boston bomber under a flimsy WMD statute. I'm sorry but this offends me because it was a pressure cooker bomb and killed three people. What kind of weapon of mass destruction is that? What kind of political ignorance would lead to such an obviously emotional charge?

I am in no way trying to excuse or mitigate these actions. If the accused is in fact guilty, he chould be tried and convicted of capital murder with aggravating circumstances and sentenced to death. Quit grandstanding. I feel the same way about "hate" crimes. A crime is a crime regardless of whom it is perpetrated upon.


Latest Activity: Apr 26, 2013 at 4:52 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Bryant
Send Bryant a Message
Report Inappropriate Content


Blog has been viewed (557) times.

theflyonthewall commented on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 17:19 PM

Bryant, I agree. Perhaps, the US attorney was trying to insure the ultimate sanction just as criminals may be sentenced to spend several lifetimes behind bars.I hope that justice is swift. The bombing was a heinous crime.

wwwhunter commented on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 19:38 PM

I agree to call the pot bomb a WMD is disingenuous at best. Call it what it is, murder, terrorism, assault with a deadly weapon but not a WMD.

Climegeist commented on Saturday, Apr 27, 2013 at 14:35 PM

I think there are a lot of overzealous federal prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves, and making little things into big things is one way to do it.

Bryant commented on Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:11 PM

Clmegeist, "making little things into big things"is possibly not the optimal choice of words. I agree with your sentiment. We often see this at the local level with multiple charges related to a single offense.

Paulie commented on Monday, Apr 29, 2013 at 18:22 PM

You do know that more than 250 people suffered injuries in the two blasts, including dozens who lost limbs?
As terrorist attacks go in the US, that's pretty mass to me. It's amazingly lucky only three people died.
Also, as Fly points out, the charge also ensures the harshest penalties possible are on the table. Massachusetts does not have the death penalty, but a federal WMD charge puts capital punishment on the table.
Federal hate crime statutes were instituted because blacks, Latinos and homosexuals, among others, were the targets of crimes solely because they were black, Latino or homosexual. I've never been the target of a crime because I am a white heterosexual.
Perhaps a specific hate crime statute is an overreach at combating racism and ignorance, but local courts were not giving sentences commensurate with some very violent crimes.

wwwhunter commented on Monday, Apr 29, 2013 at 19:27 PM

WMD to me says biological, chemical or nuclear not pressure cooker. Make no mistake the crime was terrible but to call it a WMD is to me wrong.

Paulie commented on Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:39 AM

Appreciate your thoughts, hunter.
The pressure cooker bombs used in Boston do meet the FBI definition of a WMD:
any "destructive device" as defined in Title 18 USC Section 921: any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas - bomb, grenade, rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, mine, or device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses.
Again, we all agree it was a horrific event whatever you want to call it.

Bryant commented on Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 at 17:57 PM

Paulie, it is the definition which is bogus. I go with hunter. If a pressure cooker bomb is a WMD (unless filled with a biological or chemical agent), then my mother should have to complete a background check when she needs a new one form Wal-Mart.

It's a cheesy charge and reflects a somewhat weak faith in our existing criminal statutes.

Ironside commented on Thursday, May 02, 2013 at 08:56 AM

Bryant: Your right to say that a pressure cooker is not an atom bomb, weapon of mass destruction, but in another sence it is, because of the sociological destruction it is meant to achieve, to cause us to demand more and more government control, like cameras everywhere,in order to be safe. It is a weapon of mass destrution of our freedom and our way of life. Also, this event in Boston is part of the world wide movement to destory the USA and that movement is a weapon of mass destruction. Calling a pressure cooker a weapon of mass destruction is simply a way to identify the act with the movement. We have political leaders who do not what to call it what it is, "a world wide movement by extreme elements who use Islam to control people and want to expand that control to everyone in the world. This is not new in human history, it is human history. This is just the latest version that good people must defeat.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Bryant
 
Homeland Security
February 28, 2015
An incumbent president issues an executive order. The opposition party can't block it legislatively because they don't have the votes. The states exercise the Federal courts and block implementation. Appeals pending. Constitution working just fine. Cannot say the same for politicians.
Read More »
 
County Commission
February 15, 2015
Soundoff always has people complaining about the quality of the dirt roads they live on and the ineptitude of the county public works in maintaining them. Disregarding the fact that these roads were probably not paved when the complainers moved in, I decided to check it out in my neck ...
Read More »
 
No Health Insurance for BOE Parttimers
February 13, 2015
I have to say this is the most mean spirited, short sighted, and all around lousy idea I have heard from the governor's mouth, and he's had some doozies. These people transport our children and feed them 150+ days a year. They work part time because that's what the jobs ...
Read More »
 
Facebook
February 10, 2015
Sometime ago Charles Howell wrote about the futility of expressing a political opinion on Facebook and the vehemence (my word) and name calling (writing?) which spewed forth through the ether. Being a non-user at the time I empathized but failed to appreciate the exceptionally weakminded, profane individuals populating Facebook (insert ...
Read More »
 
Senate Bills
February 07, 2015
Comments I sent to Sen. Hill and Rep. Tankersly (Jack and Jan in the future). I support some and asked questions about bothers because they concern me based on the synopsis (and I'm too pooped to research and decipher the individual bills themselves). SB 2- Allows local school boards to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology