Barrow's Pro-Nuclear Stance
Last comment by 22 5 years, 1 month ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Hey all.

Just wanted to point out a recent excerpt in the New York Times that mentions our Congressman, John Barrow. He apparently sent a letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission saying that a proposed safety filter “is not justified on a cost-benefit basis,” and suggested that the commissions should “achieve the regulatory goal in the safest, most effective, and least costly manner." The article also points out that Southern Company, which owns plant Vogtle and is building a new reactor, is his largest contributor.

The article can be found here:

I know nuclear power is a touchy subject to people, but I thought it was worth sharing one thing he is up to in Washington. Personally, I don't know anything about the newly proposed safety equipment and I have not spent much time looking at the new reactor design, so I have no valid opinion about the new reactor or what safety features it should or should not have.

Still, sure wish they would do an earthquake risk analysis on Plant Vogtle since it sits at the edge of a fault line. I know the risk is very low, but it sure would be better to be prepared for the wrost than not, and, it would be much less expensive to do relative to all the safety equipment they're proposing. It was in 1886 when Charleston got rocked by a 7.6 magnitude quake, but with risks so big, a dozen decades is only beginning of the timescale you need to consider when talking about nuclear risk and safety.

Latest Activity: Feb 26, 2013 at 8:57 PM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Climegeist
Send Climegeist a Message
Report Inappropriate Content

Blog has been viewed (903) times.

theflyonthewall commented on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2013 at 21:15 PM

Nuclear power, at least nuclear power generated through nuclear fission , is a technological deadend and a very dangerous way to boil water.

Bryant commented on Thursday, Feb 28, 2013 at 19:38 PM

Someone seems to be removing my comments? I'm not that smart so I obviously cannot be endangering the future of mankind through blog responses (or, perhaps I imagined responding).

But, to repeat, but it's a heck of a way to provide efficient, clean electricity. If we could just deal with those pesky fuel rods.

theflyonthewall commented on Thursday, Feb 28, 2013 at 21:35 PM

Bryant, Look outside.Do you see the two guys with crew cuts wearing sunglasses and cheap suits? They just got a parabolic microphone out of that black Crown Vic.

Bryant commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:29 AM

I'll use sign language from now on.

22 commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:21 PM

Dont forget what happens when the water starts to boil. Steam Power! Nuclear power is the best thing going when it comes to genarating massive amonts of energy. Heck thats all Iran wants..

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:35 PM

22, Charlie.

If you choose to believe that's all Iran wants, then good for you.

I am more skeptical than that. Why would such an oil rich nation choose to use a competing energy source? Usually nations who develop nuclear power plants need to supplement a massive power grid, or they have no natural resources of their own to draw upon. Iran does not have a massive power grid and they have ample natural resources.

22 commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 13:15 PM

One reason might be that nuclear power is a great clean energy source far better than any oil. With all the enviromental laws hindering Iran these days.

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 13:21 PM

What environment laws hinder Iran?

Based on my (limited) knowledge of Iran, I suspect a person caught violating pollution laws (if there are any) would be lightly punished or not punished at all.

22 commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 13:30 PM

If Iran does not have environment laws then the USA should go and impose them. Maybe if we can get the people to see that this world needs environmental protection then we could have the right cause to fight the radical Iranian government.

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 13:35 PM

I just gave your last comment 15 seconds of attention, because I needed to read it twice to be sure I understood the lunacy.

I gave it 13 seconds more attention than it deserved.

That's just stupid....

22 commented on Friday, Mar 01, 2013 at 13:40 PM

I'll take the 2 seconds and rase you another 13. Its about as stupid as allowing them to have nuclear power.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Climegeist
Pacific Nations & Climate Refugees
March 10, 2012 I am writing in the hopes that a few more people take note of the article recently published in the Statesboro Herald entitled "Pacific nation may buy Fiji land as climate refuge." The article describes how the leaders of the small pacific island nation of Kirbati are deciding whether ...
Read More »
Agenda 21: The UN's Dangerous Plan
February 08, 2012
Agenda 21: The UN’s Dangerous Plan to Take Over Everywhere I was born and raised in Statesboro and have been to two United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change conferences. When I read recently that members of the Tea Party are advancing the idea sustainable development--including energy conservation, smart meters, ...
Read More »
National Security and Climate Change
December 10, 2010
“We in the very top of the Navy absolutely believe that climate change is real, it is a threat to national security, and we have to deal with it now.” Rear Admiral Titley said this yesterday at the international climate negotiations here in Cancun at the U.S. Department of Defense ...
Read More »
Climate Change and Health
December 09, 2010
I have had the good fortune of meeting Sudhvir Singh, a medical student from Auckland, New Zealand who is here at the negotiations with the International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations. Below is a guest post he has asked me to share that summarizes recent research on the connections between ...
Read More »
Climate Negotiation Basics
December 08, 2010
It is tough to understand what happens at the climate negotiations and how it happens, but I am starting to wrap my head around it. Within the negotiations process, groups with similar interests come together to form coalitions to amplify their affect. Within these groups there are subgroups and sometimes ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology