All this talk about gun control!
Patriot
Last comment by Bryant 1 year, 10 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

The Second Amendment

All the talk about gun control requires are politicians to know the Second Amendment. Here is what it says: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So what does all of this mean. A well regulated Militia tells us that it must be well trained, well lead, and controlled by proper authority. The next part tells us Militias were at State level, Georgia Militia, New Jersey Militia and so on. It says “ being necessary for the security of a Free State”. Each of the 13 States back then, and now 50 States, were and are, Free and Independent States. We know that our 50 States are Free and Independent because our Founding Document the Declaration of Independence in it’s last paragraph tells us so. Here is what it says: “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, ….”. A State Militia was to protect the State from foreign threat by lending the Militia to Federal service to meet the foreign threat, and also to protect the Free and Independent State from a tyrannical Central, (Federal) Government, should it become so.

Our Revolutionary War started when the British Army left Boston in the middle of the night, to march to Concord. Paul Revere road ahead of the British, that night, towards Concord ,warning the Colonists that the “ British Are Coming”. The reason the British Army was marching to Concord was to seize the Militia’s Armory and it’s weapons. King George III was determined to impose his Central (Federal) government dictatorial rule on the Colonies and it would lead to war. The first step was to disarm the people. Our Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to insure that the people would never again be disarmed, and thus left defenseless against tyranny.

The next part states: the Right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This was mandatory ( shall not be infringed ) because the people of the State were the ones who made up the Militia. A man had his rifle and pistol ready to respond at a moments notice, to assemble into the Militia to meet the threat, to fight off an Indian attack or British soldiers during the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. It was also for personal protection from wild animals or persons bent on doing harm.

Larger weapons like cannon and today’s machine gun were not kept by the individual. They were kept in a local State Militia armory, as they are today. A Militia today is know as the State National Guard. The State National Guard is “ well regulated by proper authority “ under the Governor of the State. The Governor is the Commander-in Chief of the State National Guard, not the President. The President becomes the Commander- in- Chief of a State National Guard only when Congress passes a Declaration of War against a foreign power or threat. This has been violated by both Democrat and Republican Presidents since World War II. Sending the National Guard to fight in foreign countries without a Declaration of War is Un-Constitutional, and so is sending any member of our military without a Declaration of War.

So, in a nut shell, the 2nd Amendment the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is absolute. Any law that denies law abiding citizens from doing so, Is Un-Constitutional, and there are hundreds of gun control laws nation wide that are already Un-Constitutional, and we are talking about passing more! Our politicians do not know the 2nd Amendment.


Latest Activity: Feb 01, 2013 at 11:36 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Ironside
Send Ironside a Message
Report Inappropriate Content


Blog has been viewed (552) times.

pebbles4719 commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 15:26 PM

"Larger weapons like cannon and today’s machine gun were not kept by the individual. They were kept in a local State Militia armory, as they are today."

Based upon your statement do you believe that civilians should have the right to own guns like the AR-15? I have heard many times over and over that when the 2nd Amendment was written these types of guns were not in existence. Many feel that civilians have no use for these types of weapons. What is your thoughts on that?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 15:49 PM

Pebbles, Charlie.

When the 2nd Amendment was written, no, those weapons did not exist. The standard arm was a muzzle-loading smooth-bore flintlock. That was what the Continental Army used, the British Army used, the militia used, and was the standard colonial privately owned firearm. There were a few advanced weapons - rifled barreled flintlock that were owned by the private citizens. American militia used these accurate weapons VERY effectively against British officers. So when the 2nd Amendment was written, some citizen were better armed than the Army.

The fair comparison of a privately owned Ar-15 would be to say that today's citizen is as well armed as an individual Soldier. No more, no less.

I believe the AR-15 has a place in the population.

I do not believe full automatic machine guns do (they are illegal). Heavy machine guns like the M2 .50 cal and the 20mm and 40mm do not, and they are also illegal and tightly regulated. Just like cannons in the 1780s

So after all that, having AR-15s scattered among citizens is exactly equivalent to the armed population in the 1780s. Removing those weapons puts the citizen on a weaker footing.

pebbles4719 commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 15:55 PM

Thank you for your thoughts. Im not a big fan of any gun as they make me nervous. However, I do agree they should be owned for protection and the means of hunting.

Do you have any thoughts or suggestions on how to keep any gun out of the wrong hands? Do you think mental health is an issue?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 16:02 PM

I definitely think mental health is an issue to be considered. The issue is NOT the gun (it is an inanimate object, incapable of acting on its own).

I hate to use a meme as an example, but back in the late 70's and early 80's when drunk driving deaths were rampant, no one proposed (seriously) restricting cars or alcohol, much less banning them.

If a gun kills 20 in a school or a drunk driver kills 50 on a school bus, it is a tragedy either way. But one will send angry people to regulate guns while the other will send angry people to regulate drunk people.

pebbles4719 commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 16:09 PM

I definitely see where you are coming from. In all reality there is dangers at ever turn in our lives.

I wholeheartedly believe we need to figure out a way to keep guns out of the wrong hands. But how?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:47 PM

If I knew the correct answer to that, I'd be a very important person right now.

theflyonthewall commented on Saturday, Feb 02, 2013 at 22:09 PM

Ironside,

In a nutshell, no right is absolute. We have the freedom of speech ,but this right is qualified. Pornography is considered beyond the pale of civilized society. Commercial speech is not privileged ,and merchants who make false claims may be prosecuted. Consider the don't -cry -fire- in- a - crowded- theater prohibition.

We have the freedom of of religion ,but human sacrifice, polygamy, ritual prostitution, infanticide,suttee,thugee ,child marriage, the wearing of the kirpan and the burial rite of the Parsi are prohibited.

We have the right to public assembly. We do not have the right of insurrection despite the folklore that seems to be in vogue among the far right/reactionary strain of the Republican Party.

We have the right to bear arms ,but this right too is limited.A well regulated militia is just that --well regulated.

Do not confuse freedom with anarchy or license.To do so is to trivialize our democratic tradition. Humans beings are imperfect and since Hammurabi have recognized the need for rules to curb the dark impulses of the reptilian brain.Civilization is fragile ,and if we ignore the very great need for clear limits to human behavior , the thin tissue that separates us from the beasts dissolves.You refer to the Constitution but the Constitution is both prescriptive and proscriptive, an enumeration of rights but also a clear enunciation of the obligations expected of the body politic for the commonweal.

It's really not that hard to understand.

Ironside commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Fly: We place limits on Speech through our elected officials. Pronography is considered beyond the pale of civilized society? I strongly agree with you on this, but that is not what is happening on the internet. Our children have access to all kinds of Pronography and we are told that it is the parent's responsibility. Why not have it the responsibilty of the Adults running these sites, and if they can not come up with a foolproof system to keep it out of the view of our children, then they can not put it on the net. Freedom of speech in the 1st Amendment is freedom of political speech only. The only exception is overthrow of the government and threats to do harm to our politicians. All other speech can be regulated by law. The absolute means we have an absolute right to defend ourselves.

Gun_nut_1776 commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:36 AM

theflyonthewall - The Second Amendment protects your freedom of speech, so a little appreciation of that fact might be in order.

Bryant commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 13:39 PM

Fly, nice post.

Gun nut - The Constitution protects my freedom of speech. Supposedly. But then the Constitution didn't do too good a job protecting American citizens of Japanese descent from internment during WWII - even though their imprisonment (which was what it was) was obviously illegal. So, how would you feel if the Japanese American citizens in California had risen up and defied incarceration by the Federal governemnt with force of arms?

Gun_nut_1776 commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 15:01 PM

Bryant, respectfully, the 2nd Amendment is part of the Constitution and I dare say part of the most perfect document by which any nation was ever founded. To preserve, defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States is every citizens duty.

As to WWII, I would point out that what you propose did not happen. What happened was that the Americans of Japanese decent used the proper legal channels to challenge and eventually overturn the Democrat Roosevelt's illegal order. What should have happened was that the Military commanders of the time should have refused to carry out that order since it was an illegal one.

But you see Bryant there is the problem we have the advantage of hind sight which they did not.

What if we did have that million gun owner march on Washington and Obama feeling the Government was threatened ordered the military to fire on peaceably assembled citizens. With a million armed (but non-violent) citizens marching into the Capital who could blame him. Would it be legal, no, but I'd be willing to wager he could find someone in his military to carry out his orders.

Bryant commented on Monday, Feb 04, 2013 at 16:30 PM

Just like the National Guard at Kent State? And, the Japanese were still incarcerated and lost much property and income while in detention.

So, if the government comes for your guns, will you - like the Japanese-American citizens - hand them over and seek redress through the courts?

Gun_nut_1776 commented on Monday, Feb 04, 2013 at 18:42 PM

Legal challenges; that's what gun owners all over America are doing right now Bryant or haven't you noticed. Pray it doesn't come to anything else.

Bryant commented on Tuesday, Feb 05, 2013 at 18:14 PM

The wheels of justice grind slowly...

if you're in civil court or accused of murder in Chatham County.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Ironside
 
Obama has been a good President.
December 15, 2014
My sister sent me a Facebook posting showing a newspaper story on the latest unemployment figures. She was praising Obama for being one of our best Presidents in history. I sent her the following post. • He has done a great job as President educating the American people on what ...
Read More »
 
Obama wants to control the internet!
December 10, 2014
Obama wants to control the internet. The Internet is both good and bad for America. The good news is the tremendous instant information available to all of us. But, as my history teacher told us, “know your sources and what they are up to.” My high school days, 1963-1967, were ...
Read More »
 
Is Mob Rule running America?
November 26, 2014
Is Mob Rule Running America? Is Mob Rule running America? Ferguson was “Mob Rule”. The Rule of Law was rejected by those who destroyed the town of Ferguson. They are demanding we do away with our system of Justice and replace it with what the Mob wants done. Our Justice ...
Read More »
 
GSU vs Navy
November 17, 2014
I went to the Navy game this Saturday. GSU looked totally flat. Navy on the other hand came to play. Their Quarterback Reynolds single handedly dismantled GSU. He ran for 277 yards and six touchdowns. That is a season for a lot of running backs. What I saw on display ...
Read More »
 
GSU's Uniform Change
October 21, 2014
I went to the Idaho and saw the change to GSU's uniforms. The Iconic look of GSU's uniforms is something that should not fall victim to the "Who can come up with the flashiest uniform craze" that many teams are now going to. These teams have lost their identity. GSU's ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology