All this talk about gun control!
Patriot
Last comment by Bryant 1 year, 2 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

The Second Amendment

All the talk about gun control requires are politicians to know the Second Amendment. Here is what it says: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So what does all of this mean. A well regulated Militia tells us that it must be well trained, well lead, and controlled by proper authority. The next part tells us Militias were at State level, Georgia Militia, New Jersey Militia and so on. It says “ being necessary for the security of a Free State”. Each of the 13 States back then, and now 50 States, were and are, Free and Independent States. We know that our 50 States are Free and Independent because our Founding Document the Declaration of Independence in it’s last paragraph tells us so. Here is what it says: “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, ….”. A State Militia was to protect the State from foreign threat by lending the Militia to Federal service to meet the foreign threat, and also to protect the Free and Independent State from a tyrannical Central, (Federal) Government, should it become so.

Our Revolutionary War started when the British Army left Boston in the middle of the night, to march to Concord. Paul Revere road ahead of the British, that night, towards Concord ,warning the Colonists that the “ British Are Coming”. The reason the British Army was marching to Concord was to seize the Militia’s Armory and it’s weapons. King George III was determined to impose his Central (Federal) government dictatorial rule on the Colonies and it would lead to war. The first step was to disarm the people. Our Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to insure that the people would never again be disarmed, and thus left defenseless against tyranny.

The next part states: the Right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This was mandatory ( shall not be infringed ) because the people of the State were the ones who made up the Militia. A man had his rifle and pistol ready to respond at a moments notice, to assemble into the Militia to meet the threat, to fight off an Indian attack or British soldiers during the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. It was also for personal protection from wild animals or persons bent on doing harm.

Larger weapons like cannon and today’s machine gun were not kept by the individual. They were kept in a local State Militia armory, as they are today. A Militia today is know as the State National Guard. The State National Guard is “ well regulated by proper authority “ under the Governor of the State. The Governor is the Commander-in Chief of the State National Guard, not the President. The President becomes the Commander- in- Chief of a State National Guard only when Congress passes a Declaration of War against a foreign power or threat. This has been violated by both Democrat and Republican Presidents since World War II. Sending the National Guard to fight in foreign countries without a Declaration of War is Un-Constitutional, and so is sending any member of our military without a Declaration of War.

So, in a nut shell, the 2nd Amendment the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is absolute. Any law that denies law abiding citizens from doing so, Is Un-Constitutional, and there are hundreds of gun control laws nation wide that are already Un-Constitutional, and we are talking about passing more! Our politicians do not know the 2nd Amendment.


Latest Activity: Feb 01, 2013 at 11:36 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Ironside
Send Ironside a Message
Report Inappropriate Content


Blog has been viewed (502) times.

pebbles4719 commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 15:26 PM

"Larger weapons like cannon and today’s machine gun were not kept by the individual. They were kept in a local State Militia armory, as they are today."

Based upon your statement do you believe that civilians should have the right to own guns like the AR-15? I have heard many times over and over that when the 2nd Amendment was written these types of guns were not in existence. Many feel that civilians have no use for these types of weapons. What is your thoughts on that?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 15:49 PM

Pebbles, Charlie.

When the 2nd Amendment was written, no, those weapons did not exist. The standard arm was a muzzle-loading smooth-bore flintlock. That was what the Continental Army used, the British Army used, the militia used, and was the standard colonial privately owned firearm. There were a few advanced weapons - rifled barreled flintlock that were owned by the private citizens. American militia used these accurate weapons VERY effectively against British officers. So when the 2nd Amendment was written, some citizen were better armed than the Army.

The fair comparison of a privately owned Ar-15 would be to say that today's citizen is as well armed as an individual Soldier. No more, no less.

I believe the AR-15 has a place in the population.

I do not believe full automatic machine guns do (they are illegal). Heavy machine guns like the M2 .50 cal and the 20mm and 40mm do not, and they are also illegal and tightly regulated. Just like cannons in the 1780s

So after all that, having AR-15s scattered among citizens is exactly equivalent to the armed population in the 1780s. Removing those weapons puts the citizen on a weaker footing.

pebbles4719 commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 15:55 PM

Thank you for your thoughts. Im not a big fan of any gun as they make me nervous. However, I do agree they should be owned for protection and the means of hunting.

Do you have any thoughts or suggestions on how to keep any gun out of the wrong hands? Do you think mental health is an issue?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 16:02 PM

I definitely think mental health is an issue to be considered. The issue is NOT the gun (it is an inanimate object, incapable of acting on its own).

I hate to use a meme as an example, but back in the late 70's and early 80's when drunk driving deaths were rampant, no one proposed (seriously) restricting cars or alcohol, much less banning them.

If a gun kills 20 in a school or a drunk driver kills 50 on a school bus, it is a tragedy either way. But one will send angry people to regulate guns while the other will send angry people to regulate drunk people.

pebbles4719 commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 16:09 PM

I definitely see where you are coming from. In all reality there is dangers at ever turn in our lives.

I wholeheartedly believe we need to figure out a way to keep guns out of the wrong hands. But how?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Friday, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:47 PM

If I knew the correct answer to that, I'd be a very important person right now.

theflyonthewall commented on Saturday, Feb 02, 2013 at 22:09 PM

Ironside,

In a nutshell, no right is absolute. We have the freedom of speech ,but this right is qualified. Pornography is considered beyond the pale of civilized society. Commercial speech is not privileged ,and merchants who make false claims may be prosecuted. Consider the don't -cry -fire- in- a - crowded- theater prohibition.

We have the freedom of of religion ,but human sacrifice, polygamy, ritual prostitution, infanticide,suttee,thugee ,child marriage, the wearing of the kirpan and the burial rite of the Parsi are prohibited.

We have the right to public assembly. We do not have the right of insurrection despite the folklore that seems to be in vogue among the far right/reactionary strain of the Republican Party.

We have the right to bear arms ,but this right too is limited.A well regulated militia is just that --well regulated.

Do not confuse freedom with anarchy or license.To do so is to trivialize our democratic tradition. Humans beings are imperfect and since Hammurabi have recognized the need for rules to curb the dark impulses of the reptilian brain.Civilization is fragile ,and if we ignore the very great need for clear limits to human behavior , the thin tissue that separates us from the beasts dissolves.You refer to the Constitution but the Constitution is both prescriptive and proscriptive, an enumeration of rights but also a clear enunciation of the obligations expected of the body politic for the commonweal.

It's really not that hard to understand.

Ironside commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Fly: We place limits on Speech through our elected officials. Pronography is considered beyond the pale of civilized society? I strongly agree with you on this, but that is not what is happening on the internet. Our children have access to all kinds of Pronography and we are told that it is the parent's responsibility. Why not have it the responsibilty of the Adults running these sites, and if they can not come up with a foolproof system to keep it out of the view of our children, then they can not put it on the net. Freedom of speech in the 1st Amendment is freedom of political speech only. The only exception is overthrow of the government and threats to do harm to our politicians. All other speech can be regulated by law. The absolute means we have an absolute right to defend ourselves.

Gun_nut_1776 commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:36 AM

theflyonthewall - The Second Amendment protects your freedom of speech, so a little appreciation of that fact might be in order.

Bryant commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 13:39 PM

Fly, nice post.

Gun nut - The Constitution protects my freedom of speech. Supposedly. But then the Constitution didn't do too good a job protecting American citizens of Japanese descent from internment during WWII - even though their imprisonment (which was what it was) was obviously illegal. So, how would you feel if the Japanese American citizens in California had risen up and defied incarceration by the Federal governemnt with force of arms?

Gun_nut_1776 commented on Sunday, Feb 03, 2013 at 15:01 PM

Bryant, respectfully, the 2nd Amendment is part of the Constitution and I dare say part of the most perfect document by which any nation was ever founded. To preserve, defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States is every citizens duty.

As to WWII, I would point out that what you propose did not happen. What happened was that the Americans of Japanese decent used the proper legal channels to challenge and eventually overturn the Democrat Roosevelt's illegal order. What should have happened was that the Military commanders of the time should have refused to carry out that order since it was an illegal one.

But you see Bryant there is the problem we have the advantage of hind sight which they did not.

What if we did have that million gun owner march on Washington and Obama feeling the Government was threatened ordered the military to fire on peaceably assembled citizens. With a million armed (but non-violent) citizens marching into the Capital who could blame him. Would it be legal, no, but I'd be willing to wager he could find someone in his military to carry out his orders.

Bryant commented on Monday, Feb 04, 2013 at 16:30 PM

Just like the National Guard at Kent State? And, the Japanese were still incarcerated and lost much property and income while in detention.

So, if the government comes for your guns, will you - like the Japanese-American citizens - hand them over and seek redress through the courts?

Gun_nut_1776 commented on Monday, Feb 04, 2013 at 18:42 PM

Legal challenges; that's what gun owners all over America are doing right now Bryant or haven't you noticed. Pray it doesn't come to anything else.

Bryant commented on Tuesday, Feb 05, 2013 at 18:14 PM

The wheels of justice grind slowly...

if you're in civil court or accused of murder in Chatham County.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Ironside
 
Terrorist Anniversary
April 14, 2014
Terrorist Anniversary We are at the anniversary of the Boston Marathon Massacre. The attackers that day where Dzhokar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. They had been living among us enjoying the freedom that our country provides us. They were not trying to be “American”, they were training to be al Qaeda terrorists ...
Read More »
 
Scrimmage
April 06, 2014
The GSU Fritz Option I just got back from the GSU scrimmage, the first real look at what is to come for Georgia Southern Football. First impression tell a lot about a team. 1. The team looked in great shape, fit, strong and fast. 2. They were disciplined, well organized ...
Read More »
 
What is the Triple Option?
March 09, 2014
What is the Triple Option? When I came to Statesboro in 1985 to teach at Georgia Southern, I witnessed the greatest brand of football I had ever seen. It was Tracy Ham and the Eagles running the Triple Option. The Eagles ran the Triple Option with the quarterback under the ...
Read More »
 
Never a time for a Unicameral Legislature
February 24, 2014
Never a time for a Unicameral Legislature Our government was designed to protect “We The People” from the natural course of human events that has destroyed nation after nation and taken Freedom from the people. That natural course of human events described by our Founding Fathers in The Declaration Of ...
Read More »
 
Do we have a dictator wannabe?
January 23, 2014
Obama’s Dictatorial Executive Actions Continue. The news headline read “Obama proposes firearm background check changes”. The story by Julie Pace, AP White House Correspondent, stated “The Obama Administration on Friday announced a pair of executive actions aimed at strengthening federal background checks for gun purchasers, with a particular focus on ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology