Last comment by Bryant 5 years, 2 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Anyone reading the news or the blogs of the last few weeks could draw several conclusions. It has become obvious that "gunliness" is next to godliness and that the future of the Republic depends upon Bubba and his Browning.It is also apparent that amendments are not created equal ,so if we have problems with gun violence,censorship must be the answer--- nevermind the First Amendment.If citizens have been denied the pursuit of happiness or if the fear of mass shootings has cast a pall over the right of public assembly, the solution is to be found in good guys with guns ( possible TV show?) who will shoot bad guys with guns. Zoroastrianism lives!

Guns are powerful talismans in American culture.So could we harness the mythic power of guns to solve other problems that have heretofore gone without solution? What if we invoked the power of the word gun to solve infrastructure problems? So if the sewer farm is inadequate, call it the sewer gun instead.People--especially all of the single issue folks--- would take notice.If the Forest Drive Building on the GSU campus is essentially a congeries of rotting trailers, call it the Forest Drive Gun.If the bridge needs to be replaced ,call it the bridge gun.And what of some of our other problems? If health care is nothing but a fond hope for increasing numbers of Americans, call it health gun.If the young'uns don't know nothin', level the school gun to their thick heads until they do.

All of the is is absurd,of course, -- but true enough for those who take little interest in the state of the Union but place a disproportionate value upon guns

We can do better.

Latest Activity: Jan 25, 2013 at 1:12 PM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by theflyonthewall
Send theflyonthewall a Message
Report Inappropriate Content

Blog has been viewed (892) times.

Bryant commented on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:51 PM

Excellent blog. I like the idea of an infrastructure gun. Would that the same passion exist! How about a deficit gun?

wwwhunter commented on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 22:13 PM

How about a 'Common Since Gun' for all those people out there who want to ban 'Assault Rifles' because they look scary.

Fact while no hard data is available on 'Assault Rifles' the number of people murdered in the US (most recent year statistics are available 2010) by long rifle is 358 (FBI) and with 'Assault Rifles making up an estimated 5 to 7% of these murders that would make it about 25 people. While terrible it is hardly an epidemic at only 0.19% of the total murders in the FBI database (2010). For comparison the FBI lists 745 murders by hand, feet or fist in 2010 making it 30 times more likely you will be murdered by someone using no weapon at all when compared to an Assault Rifle.

theflyonthewall commented on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 22:32 PM

How about eliminating semiautomatics which no one really needs anyway and dispensing with the assault rifle nonsense altogether? And by the way, research into gun violence was suppressed during the Bush administration as a sop to the NRA.The carnage will continue while America sleeps.

wwwhunter commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 08:07 AM

Thanks for proving my point!

theflyonthewall commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 08:51 AM

I read about mass shootings every day which are facilitated by guns capable of a high rate of fire.Do we need such guns? Please note that I am not one of those "gun grabbers" that you may have read about. I think private citizens have every right to own a gun --just not any gun.

I think you may be one of the one- issue Americans described in my blog.

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 09:18 AM

Fly, Charlie.

How many drunk driving deaths are "facilitated" each DAY by cars and alcohol?

How many fatal beatings have been "facilitated" by baseball bats, pipes, and other blunt objects?

Recently, a mass stabbing was "facilitated" by a rampaging knife in China. Thank God it was not a full grown mentally unstable sword!


Why, why is it so hard to acknowledge that the issue is PEOPLE and not guns?

Ironside commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 09:23 AM

The Second Amendment was put into the Bill of Rights to protect "We The People" from a tyranical government that our Founding Fathers predicted would happen one day if we were not vigilant. They understood man's human nature was to consolidate all power into a central government and one person. When asked by a reporter at the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philidelphia, what kind of a government they created, Benjamin Franklin stated "A Republic if you can keep it". He was predicting where we are today. The Second Amendment is to insure that the People and the Independent States can protect themselves from a tyrannical Federal Government and dictator. Why do you think that the Federal Government wants gun control?

Bryant commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 13:03 PM

Wish all this passion transferred to fiscal issues.

theflyonthewall commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 13:35 PM

Ironside,So are you making a case for sedition? Would the sacred white buffalo return to the plains if a Republican were in power? The militia argument is nonsense,an anachronism at best.Militias had only a limited nuisance value during the Revolution. The whole idea has even less currency today. A Browning is no match for a Blackhawk."We The People" will not profit from the philosophy you are pushing.

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 14:04 PM

Fly, Charlie.

Revisionist history is not your strong suit. Stick to rhetoric. Many people I know could be a pain pain in the rotor to a Blackhawk.

Bryant, what fiscal issue would you like to discuss. I think taxes should be raised (some). I think spending should be cut (where?) I think entitlement spending should be cut more than defense spending because 1) defense spending usually means some time of employment for thousands and 2) Like it or not defense spending (one way or another) keeps the bad people in the world at bay. I have no faith that if we simply laid down our arms in peace that they would give us any.

I am willing to discuss fiscal issue with passion most anytime.

theflyonthewall commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 19:52 PM

Charlie, i'm glad your friends are skilled marksmen , but what if we exercised the same passion for the peaceful exercise of power?

i am not a revisionist. The Continental army and the French made the strategic difference during the Revolutionary War. Yorktown , the decisive battle of the Revolutionary War, was possible only because of the Continentals, the French army and the French fleet under the command of Admiral DeGrasse.
We should be indebted to the French whatever their motives. In fact, French support for the American Revolution and the financial burden that such support entailed precipitated the French Revolution.This a part of the historical record.

I am not taking anything away from the brave men who served in the militias ,but they lacked the training and the support necessary to make a strategic difference.

We would be wise to take a lesson from the history discussed in The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, an instructive book.if you read that history, it becomes very clear that being a superpower is a dubious honor. The role of military hegemon exacts a heavy toll upon any country.You are right when you describe the world as the world as a dangerous place, but armies can also be a crushing burden and the survival of any nation is dependent on other factors besides military power.Quite frankly,our present military commitments are unsustainable.This is not a new lesson. Look at the British or ,in ancient times, the Roman Empire.What is needed now is nation building -- in this country.

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 23:26 PM

Fly, I actually agree with your last paragraph.

Unlike the Romans or the British, we do not seek to establish an empire maintained with standing armies. Please don't try to pretend that we do. We fight wars, rebuild infrastructure... and leave. Been doing that since 1846.

I agree that armies are expensive, but what I believe is sucking the life out of our country are the parasites. Welfare dynasties four generations deep. Illegal aliens treated at the hospital at government expense. Foreign aid to countries we should not and cannot trust; countries that actually aid our enemies. Corrupt politicians from both parties taking graft with both hands, and STILL getting re-elected.

Sorry, if I was wielding the fiscal knife, things would be A LOT different...

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 23:33 PM

Fly, Charlie

One last thought for the night.

"...peaceful exercise of power"

OK.... no foreign aid to any country that does not share the American ideals of democracy and freedom. No money, no food, no arms. Nothing. Nada. Let them eat their damn oil or sand or whatever natural resource they have.

OMG, the bleeding heart liberals would have a COW over what a greedy country we are and that's not a Christian way to behave, etc.

Well.... I am a Christian, but I ain't Christ. I might turn the other cheek once or twice, but don't kick me in the privates, kill my friends and then complain that my country is corrupting your country. No sir, that don't cut it.

Bryant commented on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:09 PM

Charlie, Bryant

Don't want to argue fiscal policy right now. I'm tired of it and of politicians sidestepping their responsibilities to the country. Besides, I think you and I agree more than disagree.

But, I take issue with your statement about empire building, "We fight wars, rebuild infrastructure... and leave". We are still in Germany, still in Okinawa and Japan, still in South Korea, still in the Phillipines, and so it goes. And, yes, many arguments can be made about why we're still at Ramstein or along the DMZ in South Korea or anywhere else for that matter. But, bottom line is the question, "Do we have to be there?"

US foreign policy and foreign aid has rarely considered democracy and/or human rights; unless it served US interests. We overthrew the democratically elected Salvador Allende in Chile because he was (gasp) a Socialist and replaced him with the brutal military regime of August Pinochet. We decried the election of Morsi in Egypt because of his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas in Palestine (even to refusing to scknowledge the results). And we wonder why other countries call us hypocritical? It is interesting to watch Morsi's chickens coming home to roost. Apparently he misjudged the religious fervor (or lack) of most Egyptians and underestimated the economic drivers of the protests against Mubarak.

But, the same can be said for virtually every other state in the world. National interests come first and if those national interests are best served by a dictator rather than an elected official in another country, the nation (if capable) will probably takes actions to correct the situation. If incapable, the nation will seek the most favorable accomodation.

As to "bleeding heart liberals" having a cow because not supporting non-democratic regimes might be un-Christian, I thought those two terms were mutually exclusive. Aren't "bleeding heart liberals" waging war on Christianity in America?

What specific bug bit you for your last post, particularly your final statement?

Charles_and_Angie_Howell commented on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2013 at 17:49 PM

Bryant, Charlie.

We probably do agree more than disagree.

When I say that we 'leave', I mean that we do not force our culture on the country, nor do we remain as overlords. Are we still in Germany - Yes. Still in Korea and Japan - Yes. At the invitation and with the approval of the government and the of those countries. Would we leave if asked - Yes. Philippines, France, Spain, Greece.

As for what governments our government chooses to support, I scratch my head as much or more than you do. Truth is, no one in power asked me, and when I offer my opinion, they do not listen.

The bug that bit my buns on the last paragraph was a reference to the aid we give Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, etc. I do not comment on this a lot, but I have not forgot where the 9/11 hijackers came from, and I will not forget where Osama spent years hiding. It is very un-Christian to feel like I do toward those countries, but as I said, I am not Christ. Cutting ALL aid to those countries would be a nice start, but prolly not the end if I were in charge.

And while I am on this rant, let me add this (reason #762 I will NEVER be elected president) - I will talk and negotiate with anybody. And I will do it honestly and in good faith. But when the other party back-slides to get more concessions (N Korea), well, we are done. The next sound you hear will be the sound of your country starving. Invade S Korea? Go on if you're feeling froggy. Attack the US - worst mistake that country would ever, ever make.

Bryant commented on Thursday, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:57 AM

I agree with your negotiation stance. You can't lose anything by talking and seeking common ground and mutual interests.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by theflyonthewall
Computer Glitches
September 18, 2015
If this site is intended to be a community forum, the Herald needs to fix the comment section.
Read More »
Shareholders United
December 07, 2014
This January state senator Jamie Raskin of Maryland will introduce a bill which could be a model for the rest of the nation. The bill is intended to blunt the deleterious effects of the perverse Citizens United decision and strike a blow for the hallowed principle of one man, one ...
Read More »
Ballot Coaching
October 31, 2014
The polling place is ideally a neutral forum, free of political coercion and proselytizing. Indeed, large placards in front of every polling place suggest that politicking is not to be tolerated in the immediate. vicinity of any polling place. But Georgia is notorious for ballot coaching. Every Georgia ballot seems ...
Read More »
Wisdom from The Funny Pages
October 13, 2014
The venerable comic strip Pogo once made the telling observation that "We have met the enemy ,and it is us." No truer words have been spoken. So now after the turn of a new century, we are faced with a stagnant economy and a declining standard of living, the result ...
Read More »
Gaming The System
July 03, 2014
The current administration in Georgia is all about gaming the system. Complete College Georgia is all about gaming the system.It's all about the money.And Complete College Georgia is no different than a host of state enterprises that now languish because legislators lack the courage to ask for a tax increase.Complete ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology